American Institute of Certified Planners - Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct of Planner
Eddyburg
Gli USA sono un paese molto diverso da quelli dell’Europa per quanto riguarda il rapporto tra pubblico e privato, tra iniziativa individuale e regole fissate dallo Stato.
Tuttavia, in questo “Codice della condotta morale e professionale del planner” adottato nel 1981 dall’ American Institute of Certified Planners (me lo ha fornito Fabrizio Bottini) si riscontrano singolari analogia con le più classiche (e con le più avanzate) impostazioni europee. Anche oltre l’Atlantico, dove la committenza (a differenza che in Europa, è largamente privata, le prime responsabilità del Planner sono nei confronti del Pubblico: “Il primo dovere del planner è servire il pubblico interesse”. E sebbene egli debba “ accettare le decsioni del cliente concernenti gli obbiettivi e la natura dei servizi professionali prestati”, egli è sciolto da questo obbligo quando “lo svolgimento dell’azione determina una condotta illegale o incoerente con il dovere primario del planner nei confronti del pubblico interesse”. È certamente una lettura utile per chi ragiona attorno alla figura dell’urbanista.

This Code is a guide to the ethical conduct required of members of the American Institute of Certified Planners. The Code also aims at informing the public of the principles to which professional planners are committed. Systematic discussion of the application of these principles, among planners and with the public, is itself essential behavior to bring the Code into daily use.
The Code’s standards of behavior provide a basis for adjudicating any charge that a member has acted unethically. However, the Code also provides more than the minimum threshold of enforceable acceptability. It sets aspirational standards that require conscious striving to attain.
The principles of the Code derive both from the general values of society and from the planning profession’s special responsibility to serve the public interest. As the basic values of society are often in competition with each other, so also do the principles of this Code sometimes compete. For example, the need to provide full public information may compete with the need to respect confidences. Plans and programs often result from a balancing among divergent interests. An ethical judgment often also requires a conscientious balancing, based on the facts and context of a particular situation and on the precepts of the entire Code. Formal procedures for filing of complaints, investigation and resolution of alleged violations and the issuance of advisory rulings are part of the Code.

The Planner’s Responsibility to the Public

A. A planner’s primary obligation is to serve the public interest. While the definition of the public interest is formulated through continuous debate, a planner owes allegiance to a conscientiously attained concept of the public interest, which requires these special obligations:

1) A planner must have special concern for the long range consequences of present actions.

2) A planner must pay special attention to the interrelatedness of decisions.

3) A planner must strive to provide full, clear and accurate information on planning issues to citizens and governmental decision-makers.

4) A planner must strive to give citizens the opportunity to have a meaningful impact on the development of plans and programs. Participation should be broad enough to include people who lack formal organization or influence.

5) A planner must strive to expand choice and opportunity for all persons, recognizing a special responsibility to plan for the needs of disadvantaged groups and persons, and must urge the alteration of policies, institutions and decisions which oppose such needs.

6) A planner must strive to protect the integrity of the natural environment.

7) A planner must strive for excellence of environmental design and endeavor to conserve the heritage of the built environment.

The Planner’s Responsibility to Clients and Employers

B. A planner owes diligent, creative, independent and competent performance of work in pursuit of the client’s or employer’s interest. Such performance should be consistent with the planner’s faithful service to the public interest.

1) A planner must exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of clients and employers.

2) A planner must accept the decisions of a client or employer concerning the objectives and nature of the professional services to be performed unless the course of action to be pursued involves conduct which is illegal or inconsistent with the planner’s primary obligation to the public interest.

3) A planner must not, without the consent of the client or employer, and only after full disclosure, accept or continue to perform work if there is an actual, apparent, or reasonably foreseeable conflict between the interests of the client or employer and the personal or financial interest of the planner or of another past or present client or employer of the planner.

4) A planner must not solicit prospective clients or employment through use of false or misleading claims, harassment or duress.

5) A planner must not sell or offer to sell services by stating or implying an ability to influence decisions by improper means.

6) A planner must not use the power of any office to seek or obtain a special advantage that is not in the public interest nor any special advantage that is not a matter of public knowledge.

7) A planner must not accept or continue to-perform work beyond the planner’s professional competence or accept work which cannot be performed with the promptness required by the prospective client or employer, or which is required by the circumstances of the assignment.

8) A planner must not reveal information gained in a professional relationship which the client or employer has requested be held inviolate. Exceptions to this requirement of non-disclosure may be made only when (a) required by process of law, or (b) required to prevent a clear violation of law, or (c) required to prevent a substantial injury to the public. Disclosure pursuant to (b) and (c) must not be made until after the planner has verified the facts and issues involved and, when practicable, has exhausted efforts to obtain reconsideration of the matter and has sought separate opinions on the issue from other qualified professionals employed by the client or employer.

The Planner’s Responsibility to the Profession and to Colleagues

C. A planner should contribute to the development of the profession by improving knowledge and techniques, making work relevant to solutions of community problems, and increasing public understanding of planning activities. A planner should treat fairly the professional views of qualified colleagues and members of other professions.

1) A planner must protect and enhance the integrity of the profession and must be responsible in criticism of the profession.

2) A planner must accurately represent the qualifications, views and findings of colleagues.

3) A planner, who has responsibility for reviewing the work of other professionals, must fulfill this responsibility in a fair, considerate, professional and equitable manner.

4) A planner must share the results of experience and research which contribute to the body of planning knowledge.

5) A planner must examine the applicability of planning theories, methods and standards to the facts and analysis of each particular situation and must not accept the applicability of a customary solution without first establishing its appropriateness to the situation.

6) A planner must contribute time and information to the professional development of students, interns, beginning professionals and other colleagues.

7) A planner must strive to increase the opportunities for women and members of recognized minorities to become professional planners.

The Planner’s Self-Responsibility

D. A planner should strive for high standards of professional integrity, proficiency and knowledge.

1) A planner must not commit a deliberately wrongful act which reflects adversely on the planner’s professional fitness.

2) A planner must respect the rights of others and, in particular, must not improperly discriminate against persons.

3) A planner must strive to continue professional education.

4) A planner must accurately represent professional qualifications, education and affiliations.

5) A planner must systematically and critically analyze ethical issues in the practice of planning.

6) A planner must strive to contribute time and effort to groups lacking in adequate planning resources and to voluntary professional activities.

Sullo stesso tema
Mariangiola Gallingani
É consolante apprendere che dal PD viene una proposta ...
Accord et Déclaration Internationale des Instituts Nationaux et Associations d'Urbanistes Professionels des Pays de la Communauté Economique Européenne. Documento stabilito ad Amsterdam nel 1985 e approvato dalle associazioni di 20 paesi; per l'Italia, Associazione degli urbanisti e Istituto nazionale di urbanistica
I pianificatori territoriali e urbanisti esercitano la loro professione nell'interesse generale; e hanno come fulcro di riferimento il patrimonio e i beni comuni. Le regole dell’AssoUrb
Ultimi post
Eddyburg
Sono passati due anni dalla scomparsa di Edoardo Salzano. Un urbanista che non ha mai smesso di analizzare le trasformazioni urbane. Un intellettuale libero e coraggioso che con determinazione guardava avanti e non si arrendeva davanti alle ingiustizie. Un maestro. Lo ricordiamo ripubblicando uno dei suoi scritti, ancora profondamente attuale, sul mestiere dell'urbanista.
Eddyburg
Un iniziativa per ragionare sulla questione della casa a cinquant’anni dall’approvazione della prima legge per l’edilizia residenziale pubblica. Il progressivo abbandono delle politiche di edilizia residenziale ha determinato nuove disuguaglianze, aggravato i problemi pregressi, amplificato i divari territoriali, che il Covid ha accentuato e reso ancora più evidenti. Vogliamo discuterne in questo seminario organizzato in due sessioni, che riprende le vertenze che portarono all’approvazione della legge, racconta la parabola inversa delle politiche pubbliche fino al loro sostanziale azzeramento, per poi ricollegarsi all’attualità toccando attraverso alcuni casi emblematici della questione della casa in Italia.
Eddyburg
Cliccando nella barra in alto potete accedere a tutti gli articoli inseriti in oltre diciotto anni di attività e impegno per una cultura dell'abitare fruire e governare il territorio che sia suscettibile di assicurare condizioni di vita soddisfacenti sotto il profilo dell'equità e della libertà di accesso ai beni comuni, della capacità e possibilità di partecipare al governo della cosa pubblica. E' ancora una versione provvisoria del sito, perciò alcune cose funzionano male o presentano degli errori. Ci stiamo adoperando per sistemare tutto nel più breve tempo possibile.
Eddyburg
Il programma definitivo della prima edizione dei seminari di eddyburg
Redazione di eddyburg
Nell’anniversario della scomparsa di Eddy Salzano il 23 settembre abbiamo organizzato un’iniziativa per ricordare l’importanza e l’attualità del suo pensiero e della sua attività. Qui le videoregistrazioni della I Sessione del convegno “Eddy Salzano: le tappe di un percorso politico e culturale per una città più giusta” con gli interventi di Mauro Baioni, Giulio Tamburini, Vezio De Lucia, Paolo Berdini, Roberto Camagni, Anna Marson, Maria Pia Guermandi, Giancarlo Storto, Giancarlo Consonni, Paolo Baldeschi.
CopyrightMappa del sito
© 2021 Eddyburg